Monitoring & Reporting Archives - ZPE Systems https://zpesystems.com/category/remote-network-management/monitoring-reporting/ Rethink the Way Networks are Built and Managed Wed, 27 Aug 2025 18:52:10 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 https://zpesystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/flavicon.png Monitoring & Reporting Archives - ZPE Systems https://zpesystems.com/category/remote-network-management/monitoring-reporting/ 32 32 Out-of-Band Management vs FMEA: Bridging IT Recovery with Risk Mitigation https://zpesystems.com/out-of-band-management-vs-fmea-bridging-it-recovery-with-risk-mitigation/ Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:19:14 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=229114 Ahmed Algam discusses Failure Mode and Effects Analysis and how out-of-band management helps with IT recovery.

The post Out-of-Band Management vs FMEA: Bridging IT Recovery with Risk Mitigation appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
Ahmed Algam – OOB vs FMEA

Out-of-Band Management vs FMEA: Bridging IT Recovery with Risk Mitigation

By Ahmed Algam

When it comes to mission-critical infrastructure, failure isn’t a possibility, it’s an eventuality. That’s why tools like FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) exist in product validation and operational reliability.

But in IT, identifying risks isn’t enough. You have to be able to recover from them.

Let’s talk about where FMEA theory meets OOB (Out-of-Band) practice.

What is FMEA?

FMEA is a structured approach used to answer:

  • What can fail? (Failure Mode)
  • What happens if it does? (Effect)
  • How likely is it to occur?
  • How well can we detect or respond?
  • What actions can reduce risk?

Each failure scenario is scored across three dimensions:

  • Severity – How bad is the impact?
  • Occurrence – How likely is it to happen?
  • Detection – How easily can it be caught before causing damage?

The goal: Mitigate or eliminate high-risk scenarios before they cause downtime.

Where Out-of-Band Management Comes In

Now apply FMEA to IT infrastructure. Picture this:

  • A router that locks up after a patch
  • A firewall pushed with a bad config
  • A top-of-rack switch that loses uplink
  • A server stuck in BIOS after reboot

If your management tools are all in-band, you’re blind.

But with OOB, you keep access even when the network goes dark, using:

  • 4G/5G LTE fallback
  • Serial console access
  • IPMI, Redfish, or BIOS-level control
  • Out-of-band logging and alerting

How OOB Scores on the FMEA Scale

FMEA Parameter Out-of-Band Impact
Failure Mode Network, power, or OS-level outage
Effect Production outage, loss of remote access
Detection OOB alerts via console logs, PDU telemetry, heartbeat monitoring
Occurrence Reduced with safe, controlled remote management
Severity Reduced since recovery actions are possible remotely
Control Remote reboot, BIOS/IPMI access, serial console, file upload

Real-World FMEA Meets Out-of-Band Management

One customer thought they had OOB covered. They plugged a 4G modem into their Cisco router to allow remote access in case of failure.

But when the router failed, their “OOB” path failed with it because their monitoring agent was installed inside the network.

Once we showed them how to move the agent to the true OOB path (outside the primary network), it was an immediate “aha!” moment.

In FMEA terms:
They reduced Occurrence and improved Detection just by separating in-band from out-of-band.

Check out some more real-world stories like this one by reading my other article, 3 Real Lessons in Network Resilience.

Design for Recovery with ZPE

At ZPE Systems, we believe resilience starts with visibility and control, even when everything else fails. That’s the purpose of our Nodegrid platform:

  • Secure, isolated access to remote infrastructure
  • Cellular, Wi-Fi, and wired failover for real redundancy
  • Integrations with top monitoring and automation platforms
  • Smart, adaptive OOB architecture built to support FMEA-driven design

If Your FMEA Requires Recovery, We Can Help!

If your environment depends on high uptime, fast response, and remote visibility, Nodegrid is your bridge between failure analysis and real recovery.

Use the form below to contact us and let’s talk about your FMEA goals.

The post Out-of-Band Management vs FMEA: Bridging IT Recovery with Risk Mitigation appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
Yes, You Can Have A Complete Out-of-Band Management Solution In One Device! https://zpesystems.com/yes-you-can-have-out-of-band-management-in-one-device/ Tue, 17 Jun 2025 15:21:31 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=228771 Vishal Gupta discusses traditional out-of-band management solutions and shows how ZPE Systems' Nodegrid combines OOB infrastructure into one device.

The post Yes, You Can Have A Complete Out-of-Band Management Solution In One Device! appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
Vishal Gupta – Out-of-band in one device

Out-of-Band (OOB) management used to be a last resort, a ‘break glass’ tool for gaining access to failed IT. But many organizations are now realizing that out-of-band is a strategic weapon that can do much more than get them out of a jam. It can help patch systems within 48 hours, test config changes and firmware updates, and monitor infrastructure health to prevent failures and stay proactive.

But there’s one big problem that stops teams from putting together an out-of-band infrastructure: there are too many devices to piece together and manage.

Traditionally, teams have built OOB environments using multiple devices from different vendors:

  • Routers provided secure connectivity and routing logic.
  • WAN routers served as modular access points.
  • Cellular devices offered LTE/5G backup and remote cellular access when wired networks failed.
  • Serial console servers were added to gain terminal-level access to switches, firewalls, and other appliances.
  • Firewalls or VPN concentrators (for security-conscious teams) were deployed to secure management plane access through encrypted tunnels.
Devices required for OOB
And this handful of infrastructure provides only basic remote access for troubleshooting or recovery. For teams who want to become proactive, they need additional devices like automation servers, Ethernet switches, computing, and storage. This stitched-together model is unsustainable in modern IT environments because it adds complexity that teams can’t manage.

The Complexity of Multi-Device OOB Environments

For teams managing a few sites, juggling devices may be feasible. But when there are dozens, hundreds, or thousands of locations, the cracks begin to show:

1. Operational Complexity

Every device has its own OS, firmware, and configuration syntax. Pushing a global policy change like updating SSH access rules or hardening TLS settings requires custom playbooks for each platform. Over time, this increases the risk of misconfigurations and creates blind spots in security audits.

2. Troubleshooting Bottlenecks

When a site goes dark, support teams need rapid access to console ports, environmental telemetry, and WAN connectivity diagnostics. But a fragmented toolset makes root-cause analysis a game of guesswork – Did the router fail? Does the modem have signal? Is the serial port offline?

3. Inefficient Use of Space and Power

Remote cabinets and edge environments have very limited (if any) rack space. You might have 1RU or less of space, but three devices that need to be installed. Even if you get crafty and manage to squeeze them in, having multiple devices increases power draw, thermal output, and points of failure. This isn’t scalable, especially in cramped environments like cell towers, retail stores, or substations.

4. Increased Procurement and Support Costs

Assembling out-of-band networks from multiple vendor devices simply makes more work for procurement teams, who face long lead times and inconsistent licensing models. But that’s just the beginning. Costs pile up when you need to maintain this infrastructure. It’s extremely expensive to have a separate contract for each cellular device at every location, for example, which can easily add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars every year. Or, having third-party maintenance contracts for existing devices that have gone EOL.

Why Teams Dream of a Single-Box Solution

Remember when the smartphone hit the market? Rather, when it became commonplace and developers started making an app for everything? There were so many single-function devices  and items that you didn’t need anymore – phone, alarm clock, digital camera, calculator, notepad, mp3 player, flashlight – the list goes on.

Networking and IT teams are dreaming of something similar for their infrastructure. At every expo and conference in recent years, we talked with thousands of people who said that out-of-band adds too much extra equipment (and work) that they don’t want to deal with.

So, what do they want? Something that “just works,” according to those we talked to recently at RSA Conference 2025. They want to be able to deploy one box that securely comes online, can be configured remotely/automatically, and doesn’t require a bunch of other devices for automation or computing or cellular. Here are some popular wish-list use cases:

  • Remote Sites & Branch Offices: A single appliance that can offer serial access to critical equipment, cellular WAN failover, and environmental monitoring in space-constrained sites.
  • Colocation Data Centers: One platform that combines console access, VPN tunneling, and rack telemetry to reduce hardware costs and footprints.
  • Industrial & OT Environments: Ruggedized devices with extended temperature ranges, shock resistance, and power redundancy ideal for energy, utilities, and manufacturing.

Imagine their surprise when we say, “That’s our box. We do what nobody else can.”

ZPE Systems’ Nodegrid is Single-Box Out-of-Band Management and More

ZPE Systems developed this all-in-one capability and offers devices in a variety of sizes, up to 1RU. This platform is called Nodegrid and it combines the many functions we discussed, plus the ability to host third-party apps/tools, run Ansible and custom automation, and provide centralized management via on-prem deployment or ZPE Cloud connection.

ZPE Combines all the functions of OOB into one device

All-in-One Capabilities

One Nodegrid device handles all the functions of traditional, dedicated devices, including:

  • Serial console server (for direct access to routers, switches, firewalls)
  • Cellular modem (LTE/5G with dual SIM failover)
  • Ethernet routing and switching
  • Secure VPN or SD-WAN capability
  • USB out-of-band storage or keyboard-video-mouse (KVM) options

On top of these, Nodegrid runs VMs, Docker containers, apps, and automation solutions. It replaces up to nine traditional devices and fits neatly in 1RU or less of space.

Here’s how our customer Vapor IO used Nodegrid to free up 5RU and automate their deployments. Read Vapor IO case study .

Centralized Management and Policy Enforcement

Administrators can deploy and manage thousands of units through a single orchestration platform, via Nodegrid Manager (on-prem) or ZPE Cloud (SaaS). This lets them easily enforce access policies, audit activity, and automate firmware updates without relying on disparate interfaces.

Isolated Management Infrastructure Best Practices

Nodegrid provides what is called Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI), which is an industry best practice for maintaining resilience. Unlike traditional out-of-band, which relies in part on production systems, IMI creates a completely separate management network that remains accessible and online even if the production network completely fails. This lets teams access and recover their systems during an active cyberattack or outage. IMI has been used by hyperscalers for more than a decade and is now being written into new laws around the world.

Hardened Security

The Nodegrid and ZPE Cloud platform have the industry’s highest security. You can read the full security assurance document that covers the hardware, software, and cloud security features, as well as the third-party certifications. Here are some of the highlights: secure boot, signed OS, self-encrypted disk, three Synopsys validations, ISO27001, FIPS 140-3, SOC 2 Type 2.

Automation-Ready

Nodegrid integrates with Ansible, Terraform, and Python APIs, enabling Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) workflows and automated responses to network incidents. Automation can run natively on the Nodegrid device, or stored in ZPE Cloud and pushed down where needed.

Schedule a Demo

The days of piecing together out-of-band solutions are coming to a close. The overhead, security gaps, and physical constraints are driving a clear trend: simplify the edge, secure the core, and consolidate the tools.

ZPE Systems helps you do all three of these. To get hands-on with our products or chat with an engineer about your specific use case, schedule a demo at the link below.

Schedule a Demo

 

See Nodegrid in Action!

Senior Sales Engineer Marcel van Zwienen put together this 20-minute video giving you a first-hand look at Nodegrid’s interface. He shows you how ZPE Cloud makes it easy to monitor, troubleshoot, and update devices even if they’re thousands of miles away. Don’t miss it!

Watch Video

Marcel van Zwienen gives a walkthrough of ZPE Cloud for remote device management.

The post Yes, You Can Have A Complete Out-of-Band Management Solution In One Device! appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
“That’s So Obvious Now…” – 3 Real Lessons in Network Resilience https://zpesystems.com/thats-so-obvious-now-3-real-lessons-in-network-resilience/ Thu, 12 Jun 2025 15:20:52 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=228707 Ahmed Algam discusses three real-world incidents and gives practical advice to avoid outages.

The post “That’s So Obvious Now…” – 3 Real Lessons in Network Resilience appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
Ahmed Algam – Thats So Obvious Now

3 Real Lessons in Network Resilience

By Ahmed Algam

Failure is a necessary part of life. It shines a light on things that you didn’t give enough attention to, so you can learn and grow. The same goes for life in IT. We do a lot of planning to prevent failure, but it inevitably shows up and reveals the flaws in our plans. We don’t like failure, but we kind of need it.

Over the past few months, I’ve seen many real-world examples of this. These incidents drove home a hard truth about architecting for network resilience:

Out-of-Band (OOB) access isn’t optional. It’s essential.

Here are three short but very real stories that made this point crystal clear.

1. The Power Outage That Didn’t Stop Us

Our Fremont office went dark. Completely dark. There was a power outage and our provider failed to give us a heads-up, so it took us by surprise.

No power meant routers, ESXi hosts, Proxmox servers, backup systems, and even Wi-Fi were knocked offline. It was a total blackout.

But we weren’t scrambling. We had architected a true out-of-band path using LTE. Even with the production network down, we still had a way in.

From miles away, we diagnosed the problem, rebooted critical infrastructure, and got things running again before most people even noticed.

Lesson: Your recovery plan is only as good as your last mile. If your failover path isn’t truly independent, it’s not a plan – it’s wishful thinking.

2. The Engineer Who Locked Himself Out

A partner’s network went down during a routine change. Not uncommon. What was uncommon? The fact that they had no access to fix it.

All their management traffic – SSH, APIs, everything – was routed through the same production network that had just failed. When that network died, so did their ability to reach any routers or switches. The team was flying blind.

We got the call, helped them recover, and discussed IMI best practices afterward.

Lesson: Never mix management and user traffic. You need a control plane that exists outside your data plane, especially when uptime is mission-critical.

3. “That’s So Obvious Now…” – The Failover Fail

A customer had the right idea: install a 4G modem as a failover path. This is common, and it’s a great way to gain access in case the main path goes down.

But the modem was physically wired into their primary Cisco router.

When that router failed (power surge), so did the modem. To make things worse, their monitoring agent was running in-band. So when the network collapsed, their monitoring did, too. No visibility, no access, no control.

We pointed out this problem. Then we suggested running the agent on dedicated OOB gear instead. Their response?

That’s so obvious now…but I didn’t even think about it.

Lesson: Monitoring doesn’t help if it goes down with everything else. Build it into your OOB infrastructure. Make it resilient, not just present.

What I Want You To Take Away From These Stories

Resilience isn’t just about having backup tools or extra hardware. It’s about designing for failure.

It’s about building your architecture so that even if the core goes dark, you still have eyes and hands on the network.

Out-of-Band isn’t a Luxury. It’s your Lifeline. Make sure to Architect it like one.

Here Are Resources to Help Build Your OOB Lifeline

 

Get Hands-On Help From Our Engineers

My colleagues have years of experience architecting these resilience practices. Please use the form to send us a message and get help with your specific use case.

The post “That’s So Obvious Now…” – 3 Real Lessons in Network Resilience appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
After The Firewall Fails: How Gen 3 Out-of-Band Cuts the Ransomware Killchain https://zpesystems.com/after-the-firewall-fails-how-gen-3-out-of-band-cuts-the-ransomware-killchain/ Thu, 05 Jun 2025 14:14:04 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=228626 Mike Sale explains how ransomware makes traditional access useless, and how Gen 3 out-of-band management cuts the killchain.

The post After The Firewall Fails: How Gen 3 Out-of-Band Cuts the Ransomware Killchain appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
How Gen 3 Out-of-Band Cuts the Ransomware Killchain

It’s always frustrating for me to hear about another breach that goes deep. Not because attacks happen (they will), but because so many of them spiral out of control for the same reason: no access, no visibility, no plan that uses the best tools available

Leadership feels reassured when they spend top dollar on prevention. But they overlook the most important part of resilience: mitigation. You can’t build a resilient network with defense alone. You need a plan for when that defense fails. There’s no shortage of high-profile reminders of this

Imagine a submarine breach. Cold water rushes in. The crew is trained, alert, and ready to respond. But when they open the repair locker, all they find is duct tape, a flashlight, and hope. That’s what most IT teams face in a cyberattack.

Without the right tools in place, even the best trained teams can be rendered powerless by a breach. Gen 3 Out-of-Band changes that. It’s your pressure control, isolation chamber, and emergency patch kit that works when everything else doesn’t

Let’s look at a reality-based scenario of how these attacks play out…and how the results can be completely different.

The Breach And The Catastrophe That Follows

The attack begins quietly in the early morning hours. It’s 4:19AM when a sleeper process hidden in the network core activates. Within seconds, systems begin to go offline. At first, it looks like a glitch. But it’s not. It’s ransomware – coordinated, efficient, and already moving laterally.

Dashboards light up, but the core infrastructure is already compromised. Your monitoring tools freeze. VPNs fail. DNS is offline. Something’s wrong, but you can’t see how bad it is. And worse, you can’t do anything about it.

A dark and ominous underwater scene featuring a large submarine submerged in deep ocean waters. The

Your best engineer tries to log in from home. But, SSH hangs. Remote desktop times out. Someone asks if there’s a different way in. Maybe out-of-band access that is not dependent on VLAN1? There’s a moment of hope. An old console server buried in a rack…

But it was decommissioned years ago. Management called it redundant.

Locked Out And Looking In

Internal chats fill with speculation as the situation deteriorates by the minute. Even the cloud console is inaccessible. Your team is blind. No one knows how wide the blast radius is. You can’t tell which systems are down, which are salvageable, or where the attack might spread to next. Backup jobs that were configured on the same network are silent too.

In a last ditch effort, someone volunteers to drive to the datacenter. But, all that’s waiting for them is a locked building that they can’t get into. The badge reader is on the same compromised system. No remote access. No local access. Just a locked door and a blinking red light.

By 8:00 AM, retail locations are trying to open. Customers are walking through the doors and the IT team can only watch the damage unfold. Sure, trucks are rolling, but the systems are down and social media is lighting up. And while the team knows exactly what’s happening, there’s nothing they can do to stop it.

What Goes Wrong With In-Band Management

The problem isn’t that no one had a plan. It’s that they had no access. Without a resilient, independent management plane, even the best playbook can’t be executed.

  • You can’t isolate systems.
  • You can’t confirm where the threat is.
  • You can’t cycle power, restore backups, or even assess the blast radius.
  • You can’t prove you did anything right, because you can’t do anything at all!

When everything depends on a single, fragile production path, any failure becomes total. You’re not just locked out of tools – you’re locked out of the fight.

In-Band management risks admin access

Image: In-band management is risky because admin access shares the same link as the production network. Any production failure cuts admin access.

The Breach And Fast Recovery With Gen 3 Out-of-Band

Now imagine the same breach, at the same hour. The ransomware behaves the same way. Core systems go down. DNS disappears. Monitoring dies. But this time, the team has something different: ZPE’s Gen 3 Out-of-Band infrastructure.

As the attack unfolds, IT first responders are already inside, connected securely through ZPE’s Nodegrid. It doesn’t matter if DNS is down or the VPN won’t connect. You don’t need the production network at all. Unlike that old console server, this connection is entirely separate, isolated by design, and hardened for moments like this.

Instead of floundering in the dark, the team sees exactly what’s happening. They access routers, switches, and servers directly from wherever they are without relying on the compromised environment. One by one, they identify which systems are clean, which are compromised, and which need to be taken offline.

IMI via Gen 3 out-of-band

Image: Gen 3 out-of-band is fully isolated, giving you admin access to isolate, cleanse, and restore systems. This is the only way to cut the ransomware killchain and recover from an attack.

There’s no guesswork, only action. Segments of the network go dark, but intentionally this time. Teams shut down infected zones by port, node, or site. They use ZPE’s devices to restore clean systems from verified backups, remotely power cycle PDUs, and automatically push restore scripts locally. There’s no need for physical access. No one drives to the datacenter. There’s no scramble for access credentials or badge overrides.

The breach is being contained before customers begin to arrive. Core systems are stable. Edge environments are clean. Business resumes without disruption. No social backlash. No ticket surge. No headlines. The fire never reaches the storefront.

How Gen 3 Out-of-Band Makes The Difference

Gen 3 Out-of-Band gives you something most teams don’t have during a crisis: control. Not the illusion of control, but real, operational access no matter what happens to your primary infrastructure.

  • You don’t depend on your main network.
  • You don’t wait for remote hands.
  • You don’t lose time chasing access.
  • You take action quickly, securely, and from anywhere.
ZPE is the drop-in Gen 3 out-of-band solution

Image: ZPE’s Gen 3 out-of-band management solution drops into your environment and hosts all the tools and services for cutting the ransomware killchain.

Because when your network goes dark, Gen 3 out-of-band stays lit. That’s the difference between responding to a crisis and becoming one.

Get a Ransomware Recovery Walkthrough

What to do if youre ransomwared

My colleague James Cabe put together this article that walks you through the ransomware recovery process. He explains why you need more than backups, redundancy, and a Disaster Recovery strategy, and gives you practical, open-source tools to deploy an Isolated Recovery Environment. Check it out!

The post After The Firewall Fails: How Gen 3 Out-of-Band Cuts the Ransomware Killchain appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
Rollback Gone Wrong: How Out-of-Band Management Saved Our Engineering Backbone https://zpesystems.com/rollback-gone-wrong-how-out-of-band-management-saved-our-engineering-backbone_/ Fri, 23 May 2025 18:17:01 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=228545 ZPE's IT and Systems Administrator Ahmed Algam shows how out-of-band management helps you recover when your rollback fails.

The post Rollback Gone Wrong: How Out-of-Band Management Saved Our Engineering Backbone appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
Ahmed Algam – Rollback Gone Wrong
My name is Ahmed Algam. I am an IT & Systems Administrator for ZPE Systems – A Brand of Legrand, with over 20 years of experience in network administration, system infrastructure, Microsoft ERP solutions, and enterprise IT management. I have a B.S. in Computer Science and will soon complete my Master’s of Information and Data Science.

Every IT person knows that network updates are routine. Sometimes they can work perfectly, and other times, the update messes things up and you have to roll back to the last good configuration.

But what do you do when the rollback goes wrong?

Here’s my first-hand experience with this exact scenario.

We recently implemented what was intended to be a routine update for our engineering network. The change timeframe, internal signoff, test coverage, and rollback strategy were all set up. Every step was even pre-documented. The setup was textbook.

But if you’ve been in IT for more than five minutes, you know that upgrades don’t always fail in the first stage.

The initial steps had gone smoothly and we had a sense of confidence. But midway through, this one failed. It damaged a core routing service and stopped our ability to reach our remote sites.

No big deal. We had a step-by-step rollback plan that we validated in the lab. We even walked through it with a dry run.

Then things took an unexpected turn.

Our rollback failed!

Why? In the background, one dependent service was automatically upgraded. This silently triggered a chain reaction. We found ourselves dealing with Entra ID login loops, DHCP failures, and version mismatches across multiple services. Our internal DNS collapsed. With DNS gone, so was access to our identity provider, our management tools, and even our door badge system.

The access control system was no longer available to us. It was one of those nights. The rollback was supposed to save us, but what could save us from the rollback?

Luckily, we had out-of-band management

We were saved by Out-of-Band (OOB) management through our ZPE architecture.

We used secure OOB serial and cellular failover. That gave us direct control of the devices, even when the core network was down and identity services were unreachable. We stayed operational.

Ahmed Algam uses out-of-band management to recover from a failed rollback

Image: The out-of-band management path is a dedicated access network. It acts as a safety net for instances when a rollback fails and recovery processes must take place.

Fortunately, we had already segmented the engineering network from the business network. That isolation meant the failure didn’t spread. We could take our time rebuilding the broken pieces without impacting customer operations or internal productivity tools.

All services were back up and running within a few hours.

What did we learn?

I’m posting this because a lot of IT teams, particularly those in growth-stage businesses, neglect early architecture segmentation or OOB access. It is considered a “Phase 2” assignment. However, it’s the only way out should things go wrong, which they will.

Here’s what we learned:

  • The quality of your assumptions determines how well your rollback strategy works. A rollback that depends on “nothing else changes” is fragile by design.
  • DNS, Identity (like Entra ID), and VPN are interdependent. They form a delicate triangle, and when one goes, the others often follow.
  • Out-of-Band is a fundamental design need, not just a catastrophe recovery tool. If you’re managing remote or critical infrastructure, there is no substitute for direct, independent access.
  • Documentation is important. Access is more important. All the runbooks in the world won’t help if you can’t reach the system that runs them.

Prepare for failure. Walk through your worst-case scenario. Don’t count on luck to save you.

Watch this demo on how to roll back and recover

My colleague Marcel put together this demo video which shows how to access, configure, and recover infrastructure, even if you’re thousands of miles away.

Marcel van Zwienen gives a walkthrough of ZPE Cloud for remote device management.

Set Up Your Own Out-of-Band Management With Starlink

Download this guide on how to set up an out-of-band network using Starlink. It includes technical wiring diagrams and a guided walkthrough.

You can download it here: How to Build Out-of-Band With Starlink

Starlink setup guide

The post Rollback Gone Wrong: How Out-of-Band Management Saved Our Engineering Backbone appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
Why Gen 3 Out-of-Band Is Your Strategic Weapon in 2025 https://zpesystems.com/why-gen-3-out-of-band-is-your-strategic-weapon-in-2025/ Fri, 23 May 2025 17:44:31 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=228533 Mike Sale discusses why Gen 3 out-of-band management is a strategic weapon that helps you get better ROI on your IT investments.

The post Why Gen 3 Out-of-Band Is Your Strategic Weapon in 2025 appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
Mike Sale – Why Gen 3 Out-of-Band is Your Strategic Weapon

I think it’s time to revisit the old school way of thinking about managing and securing IT infrastructure. The legacy use case for OOB is outdated. For the past decade, most IT teams have viewed out-of-band (OOB) as a last resort; an insurance policy for when something goes wrong. That mindset made sense when OOB technology was focused on connecting you to a switch or router.

Technology and the role of IT have changed so much in the last few years. There’s a lot more pressure on IT folks these days! But we get it, and that’s why ZPE’s OOB platform has changed to help you.

At a minimum, you have to ensure system endpoints are hardened against attacks, patch and update regularly, back up and restore critical systems, and be prepared to isolate compromised networks. In other words, you have to make sure those complicated hybrid environments don’t go off the rails and cost your company money. OOB for the “just-in-case” scenario doesn’t cut it anymore, and treating it that way is a huge missed opportunity.

Don’t Be Reactive. Be Resilient By Design.

Some OOB vendors claim they have the solution to get you through installation day, doomsday, and everyday ops. But if I’m candid, ZPE is the only vendor who can live up to this standard.   We do what no one else can do! Our work with the world’s largest, most well-known hyperscale and tech companies proves our architecture and design principles.

This Gen 3 out-of-band (aka Isolated Management Infrastructure) is about staying in control no matter what gets thrown at you.

OOB Has A New Job Description

Out-of-band is evolving because of today’s radically different network demands:

  • Edge computing is pushing infrastructure into hard-to-reach (sometimes hostile) environments.
  • Remote and hybrid ops teams need 24/7 secure access without relying on fragile VPNs.
  • Ransomware and insider threats are rising, requiring an isolated recovery path that can’t be hijacked by attackers.
  • Patching delays leave systems vulnerable for weeks or months, and faulty updates can cause crashes that are difficult to recover from.
  • Automation and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) are no longer nice-to-haves – they’re essential for things like initial provisioning, config management, and everyday ops.

It’s a lot to add to the old “break/fix” job description. That’s why traditional OOB solutions fall short and we succeed. ZPE is designed to help teams enforce security policies, manage infrastructure proactively, drive automation, and do all the things that keep the bad stuff from happening in the first place. ZPE’s founders knew this evolution was coming, and that’s why they built Gen 3 out-of-band.

Gen 3 Out-of-Band Is Your Strategic Weapon

Unlike normal OOB setups that are bolted onto the production network, Gen 3 out-of-band is physically and logically separated via Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) approach. That separation is key – it gives teams persistent, secure access to infrastructure without touching the production network.

This means you stay in control no matter what.

Gen 3 out-of-band management uses IMI

Image: Gen 3 out-of-band management takes advantage of an approach called Isolated Management Infrastructure, a fully separate network that guarantees admin access when the main network is down.

Imagine your OOB system helping you:

  • Push golden configurations across 100 remote sites without relying on a VPN.
  • Automatically detect config drift and restore known-good states.
  • Trigger remediation workflows when a security policy is violated.
  • Run automation playbooks at remote locations using integrated tools like Ansible, Terraform, or GitOps pipelines.
  • Maintain operations when production links are compromised or hijacked.
  • Deploy the Gartner-recommended Secure Isolated Recovery Environment to stop an active cyberattack in hours (not weeks).

 

Gen 3 out-of-band is the dedicated management plane that enables all these things, which is a huge strategic advantage. Here are some real-world examples:

  • Vapor IO shrunk edge data center deployment times to one hour and achieved full lights-out operations. No more late-night wakeup calls or expensive on-site visits.
  • IAA refreshed their nationwide infrastructure while keeping 100% uptime and saving $17,500 per month in management costs.
  • Living Spaces quadrupled business while saving $300,000 per year. They actually shrunk their workload and didn’t need to add any headcount.

OOB is no longer just for the worst day. Gen 3 out-of-band gives you the architecture and platform to build resilience into your business strategy and minimize what the worst day could be.

Mike Sale on LinkedIn

Connect With Me!

The post Why Gen 3 Out-of-Band Is Your Strategic Weapon in 2025 appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
When IT Goes Dark: What I Wish I Knew 20 Years Ago https://zpesystems.com/when-it-goes-dark-what-i-wish-i-knew-20-years-ago/ Fri, 16 May 2025 20:30:18 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=228413 ZPE's Network and Systems Administrator Ahmed Algam discusses outage recovery and how out-of-band management helped quickly restore services.

The post When IT Goes Dark: What I Wish I Knew 20 Years Ago appeared first on ZPE Systems.

]]>
Ahmed Algam

“No one ever tells you this part…”

My name is Ahmed Algam. I am a Network & Systems Administrator for ZPE Systems – A Brand of Legrand, with over 20 years of experience in network administration, system infrastructure, Microsoft ERP solutions, and enterprise IT management. I have a B.S. in Computer Science and will soon complete my Master’s of Information and Data Science.

In the early days of my IT career, I learned how to build systems from scratch, configure networks, and apply patches.

Like many, I was trained to focus on the obvious goals: keep things running, keep everything secure, and automate what I can.

But what no one taught me? What to do when everything goes dark – literally.

That’s exactly what happened recently.

ZPE’s Fremont branch lost power unexpectedly and without notice from our provider.

One by one, our services went down

  • ESXi Hosts
  • Backup Servers
  • VPN Tunnels
  • Core Routers and Switches

Here is the part that I wish I knew 20 years ago…

You won’t be rescued by dashboards, spreadsheets, or documentation when IT goes dark. What WILL save you is system design, specifically out-of-band management.

And for which I am lucky that design did save us.

Without Out-of-band (OOB), I would have had to spend the whole night at the office manually rebooting, configuring, and troubleshooting everything. It’s a nightmare for IT admins because you might get the call while you’re attending your kids’ sporting events, attending college courses, or spending quality time with your family. IT emergencies can really intrude on your life outside of work. It’s just part of the job.

But I was so grateful to have OOB because it gave me a separate path dedicated to recovery, which was just what I needed. I was able to instantly remote-into my infrastructure without leaving home.

IMI and OOBM are a dedicated path to system recovery

Image: Isolated Management Infrastructure uses out-of-band management (OOBM) serial consoles to access production devices when they are offline.

Within minutes, I was able to:

  • Remotely connect through our OOB console
  • Restart critical infrastructure
  • Monitor recovery independently of the production path

I didn’t have to head for the office or change the plans I had with my family. With our OOB system in place, I knew that I could fix the problem, have services restored before sunrise, and still get a good night’s sleep.

This wasn’t luck

It was the result of:

  • Planning for the worst-case scenario, not just the routine
  • Having OOB in all essential areas
  • Testing access methods instead of assuming they’ll just work
  • Separating management traffic from production flows
  • Staying calm with an architecture designed to withstand chaos

 

Even highly-skilled IT teams come to a full standstill during disruptions

It has nothing to do with a lack of talent or skill. The reason is their inability to access the malfunctioning systems.

So here’s my advice to every IT professional:

  • Now is the time to prepare for the worst
  • Make an OOB network
  • Separate management paths from production (and test access!)

    Because when the lights go out, that’s when real IT begins.

    Starlink setup guide

    Here’s How You Can Set Up Out-of-Band Management

    My colleagues recently created this guide on how to set up an out-of-band network using Starlink. It includes technical wiring diagrams and a guided walkthrough.

    You can download it here: How to Build Out-of-Band With Starlink

    The post When IT Goes Dark: What I Wish I Knew 20 Years Ago appeared first on ZPE Systems.

    ]]>
    Out-of-Band vs. Isolated Management Infrastructure: What’s the Difference? https://zpesystems.com/out-of-band-vs-isolated-management-infrastructure-whats-the-difference/ Fri, 09 May 2025 20:51:45 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=228291 Compare out-of-band vs Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) to learn about the important distinction regarding operational resilience.

    The post Out-of-Band vs. Isolated Management Infrastructure: What’s the Difference? appeared first on ZPE Systems.

    ]]>
    Out-of-band vs IMI
    To stay ahead of network outages, cyberattacks, and unexpected infrastructure failures, IT teams rely on remote access tools. Out-of-band (OOB) management is traditionally used for quick access to troubleshoot and resolve issues when the main network goes down. But in the past decade, hyperscalers and leading enterprises have developed a more advanced approach called Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI). Although IMI incorporates OOB, it’s important to understand the distinction between the two, especially when designing infrastructure to be resilient and scalable.

    What is Out-of-Band Management?

    Out-of-Band Management has been around for decades. It gives IT administrators remote access to network equipment through an independent channel, serving as a lifeline when the primary network is down.

    Traditional out-of-band provides a secondary path to production equipment

    Image: Traditional out-of-band solutions provide a secondary path to production infrastructure, but still rely in part on production equipment.

    Most OOB solutions are like a backup entrance: if the main network is compromised, locked, or unavailable, OOB provides a way to “go around the front door” and fix the problem from the outside.

    Key Characteristics:

    • Separate Path: Usually uses dedicated serial ports, USB consoles, or cellular links.
    • Primary Use Cases: Though OOB can be used for regular maintenance and updates, it’s typically used for emergency access, remote rebooting, BIOS/firmware-level diagnostics, and sometimes initial provisioning.
    • Tools Involved: Console servers, terminal servers, or devices with embedded OOB ports (e.g., BMC/IPMI for servers).

    Business Impact:

    From a business standpoint, traditional OOB solutions offer reactive resilience that helps resolve outages faster and without costly site visits. It also reduces Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) and enhances the ability to manage remote or unmanned locations.

    However, solutions like ZPE Systems’ Nodegrid provide robust capability that evolves out-of-band to a new level. This comprehensive, next-gen OOB is called Isolated Management Infrastructure.

    What is Isolated Management Infrastructure?

    Isolated Management Infrastructure furthers the concept of resilience and is a natural evolution of out-of-band. IMI does two things:

    1. Rather than just providing a secondary path into production devices, IMI creates a completely separate management plane that does not rely on any production device.
    2. IMI incorporates its own switches, routers, servers, and jumpboxes to support additional critical IT functions like networking, computing, security, and automation.

    Isolated management infrastructure provides a fully separate management path

    Image: Isolated Management Infrastructure creates a completely separate management plane and full-stack platform for maintaining critical services even during disruptions, and is strongly encouraged by CISA BOD 23-02.

    IMI doesn’t just provide access during a crisis – it creates a separate layer of control and serves as a resilience system that keeps core services running no matter what. This gives organizations proactive resilience from simple upgrade errors and misconfigurations, to ransomware attacks and global disruptions like 2024’s CrowdStrike outage.

    Key Characteristics:

    • Fully Isolated Design: The management plane is physically and logically isolated from the production network, with console access to all production devices via a variety of interfaces including RS-232, Ethernet, USB, and IPMI.
    • Backup Links: Uses two or more backup links for reliable access, such as 5G, Starlink, and others.
    • Multi-Functionality: Hosts network monitoring, DNS, DHCP, automation engines, virtual firewalls, and all tools and functions to support critical services during disruptions.
    • Automation: Provides a safe environment for teams to build, test, and integrate automation workflows, with the ability to automatically revert back to a golden image in case of errors.
    • Ransomware Recovery: Hosts all tools, apps, and services to deploy the Gartner-recommended Secure Isolated Recovery Environments (SIRE).
    • Zero Trust and Compliance Ready: Built to minimize blast radius and support regulated environments, with segmentation and zero trust security features such as MFA and Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC).

    Business Impact:

    IMI enables operational continuity in the face of cyberattacks, misconfigurations, or outages. It aligns with zero-trust principles and regulatory frameworks like NIST 800-207, making it ideal for government, finance, and healthcare. It also provides a foundation for modern DevSecOps and AI-driven automation strategies.

    Comparing Reactive vs. Proactive Resilience


    Purpose
    Deployment
    Services Hosted
    Typical Vendors
    Best For
    Out-of-Band
    Recover access when production is down
    Console servers or cellular-based devices
    None (access only)
    Opengear, Lantronix
    Legacy networks, branch recovery
    IMI
    Maintain operations even when production is down
    Full-stack platform (compute, network, storage)
    Firewalls, monitoring, DNS, etc.
    ZPE Systems (Nodegrid), custom-built IMI
    Modern, zero-trust, AI-driven environments

    Why Businesses Should Care

    For CIOs and CTOs

    IMI is more than a management tool – it’s a strategic shift in infrastructure design. It minimizes dependency on the production network for critical IT functions and gives teams a layered defense. For organizations using AI, hybrid-cloud architectures, or edge computing, IMI is strongly encouraged and should be incorporated into the initial design.

    For Network Architects and Engineers

    IMI significantly reduces manual intervention during incidents. Instead of scrambling to access firewalls or core switches when something breaks, teams can rely on an isolated environment that remains fully operational. It also enables advanced automation workflows (e.g., self-healing, dynamic traffic rerouting) that just aren’t possible in traditional OOB environments.

    Get a Demo of IMI

    Set up a 15-minute demo to see IMI in action. Our experts will show you how to automatically provision devices, recover failed equipment, and combat ransomware. Use the button to set up your demo now.

    Watch How IMI Improves Security

    Rene Neumann (Director of Solution Engineering) gives a 10-minute presentation on IMI and how it enhances security.

    Cisco Live 2024 – Securing the Network Backbone

    The post Out-of-Band vs. Isolated Management Infrastructure: What’s the Difference? appeared first on ZPE Systems.

    ]]>
    Why AI System Reliability Depends On Secure Remote Network Management https://zpesystems.com/why-ai-system-reliability-depends-on-secure-remote-network-management/ Wed, 07 May 2025 20:47:45 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=228280 AI system reliability is about ensuring AI is available even when things go wrong. Here's why secure remote network management is key.

    The post Why AI System Reliability Depends On Secure Remote Network Management appeared first on ZPE Systems.

    ]]>
    Thumbnail – AI System Reliability

    AI is quickly becoming core to business-critical ops. It’s making manufacturing safer and more efficient, optimizing retail inventory management, and improving healthcare patient outcomes. But there’s a big question for those operating AI infrastructure: How can you make sure your systems stay online even when things go wrong?

    AI system reliability is critical because it’s not just about building or using AI – it’s about making sure it’s available through outages, cyberattacks, and any other disruptions. To achieve this, organizations need to support their AI systems with a robust underlying infrastructure that enables secure remote network management.

    The High Cost of Unreliable AI

    When AI systems go down, customers and business users immediately feel the impact. Whether it’s a failed inference service, a frozen GPU node, or a misconfigured update that crashes an edge device, downtime results in:

    • Missed business opportunities
    • Poor customer experiences
    • Safety and compliance risks
    • Unrecoverable data losses

    So why can’t admins just remote-in to fix the problem? Because traditional network infrastructure setups use a shared management plane. This means that management access depends on the same network as production AI workloads. When your management tools rely on the production network, you lose access exactly when you need it most – during outages, misconfigurations, or cyber incidents. It’s like if you were free-falling and your reserve parachute relied on your main parachute.

    Direct remote access is risky

    Image: Traditional network infrastructures are built so that remote admin access depends at least partially on the production network. If a production device fails, admin access is cut off.

    This is why hyperscalers developed a specific best practice that is now catching on with large enterprises, Fortune companies, and even government agencies. This best practice is called Isolated Management Infrastructure, or IMI.

    What is Isolated Management Infrastructure?

    Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) separates management access from the production network. It’s a physically and logically distinct environment used exclusively for managing your infrastructure – servers, network switches, storage devices, and more. Remember the parachute analogy? It’s just like that: the reserve chute is a completely separate system designed to save you when the main system is compromised.

    IMI separates management access from the production network

    Image: Isolated Management Infrastructure fully separates management access from the production network, which gives admins a dependable path to ensure AI system reliability.

    This isolation provides a reliable pathway to access and control AI infrastructure, regardless of what’s happening in the production environment.

    How IMI Enhances AI System Reliability:

    1. Always-On Access to Infrastructure
      Even if your production network is compromised or offline, IMI remains reachable for diagnostics, patching, or reboots.
    2. Separation of Duties
      Keeping management traffic separate limits the blast radius of failures or breaches, and helps you confidently apply or roll back config changes through a chain of command.
    3. Rapid Problem Resolution
      Admins can immediately act on alerts or failures without waiting for primary systems to recover, and instantly launch a Secure Isolated Recovery Environment (SIRE) to combat active cyberattacks.
    4. Secure Automation
      Admins are often reluctant to apply firmware/software updates or automation workflows out of fear that they’ll cause an outage. IMI gives them a safe environment to test these changes before rolling out to production, and also allows them to safely roll back using a golden image.

    IMI vs. Out-of-Band: What’s the Difference?

    While out-of-band (OOB) management is a component of many reliable infrastructures, it’s not sufficient on its own. OOB typically refers to a single device’s backup access path, like a serial console or IPMI port.

    IMI is broader and architectural: it builds an entire parallel management ecosystem that’s secure, scalable, and independent from your AI workloads. Think of IMI as the full management backbone, not just a side street or second entrance, but a dedicated freeway. Check out this full breakdown comparing OOB vs IMI.

    Use Case: Finance

    Consider a financial services firm using AI for fraud detection. During a network misconfiguration incident, their LLMs stop receiving real-time data. Without IMI, engineers would be locked out of the systems they need to fix, similar to the CrowdStrike outage of 2024. But with IMI in place, they can restore routing in minutes, which helps them keep compliance systems online while avoiding regulatory fines, reputation damage, and other potential fallout.

    Use Case: Manufacturing

    Consider a manufacturing company using AI-driven computer vision on the factory floor to spot defects in real time. When a firmware update triggers a failure across several edge inference nodes, the primary network goes dark. Production stops, and on-site technicians no longer have access to the affected devices. With IMI, the IT team can remote-into the management plane, roll back the update, and bring the system back online within minutes, keeping downtime to a minimum while avoiding expensive delays in order fulfillment.

    How To Architect for AI System Reliability

    Achieving AI system reliability starts well before the first model is trained and even before GPU racks come online. It begins at the infrastructure layer. Here are important things to consider when architecting your IMI:

    • Build a dedicated management network that’s isolated from production.
    • Make sure to support functions such as Ethernet switching, serial switching, jumpbox/crash-cart, 5G, and automation.
    • Use zero-trust access controls and role-based permissions for administrative actions.
    • Design your IMI to scale across data centers, colocation sites, and edge locations.

    How the Nodegrid Net SR isolates and protects the management network.

    Image: Architecting AI system reliability using IMI means deploying Ethernet switches, serial switches, WAN routers, 5G, and up to nine total functions. ZPE Systems’ Nodegrid eliminates the need for separate devices, as these edge routers can host all the functions necessary to deploy a complete IMI.

    By treating management access as mission-critical, you ensure that AI system reliability is built-in rather than reactive.

    Download the AI Best Practices Guide

    AI-driven infrastructure is quickly becoming the industry standard. Organizations that integrate an Isolated Management Infrastructure will gain a competitive edge in AI system reliability, while ensuring resilience, security, and operational control.

    To help you implement IMI, ZPE Systems has developed a comprehensive Best Practices Guide for Deploying Nvidia DGX and Other AI Pods. This guide outlines the technical success criteria and key steps required to build a secure, AI-operated network.

    Download the guide and take the next step in AI-driven network resilience.

    The post Why AI System Reliability Depends On Secure Remote Network Management appeared first on ZPE Systems.

    ]]>
    Overcoming the Challenges of PDU Management in Modern IT Environments https://zpesystems.com/overcoming-the-challenges-of-pdu-management-in-modern-it-environments/ Fri, 02 May 2025 21:47:03 +0000 https://zpesystems.com/?p=228251 Discover the best practices to make PDU management simple and scalable without the need for on-site visits. Download the guide here.

    The post Overcoming the Challenges of PDU Management in Modern IT Environments appeared first on ZPE Systems.

    ]]>
    Overcoming PDU Management Challenges

    Power Distribution Units (PDUs) are the unsung heroes of reliable IT operations. They provide the one thing that nobody pays attention to unless it’s gone: stable, uninterrupted power. Despite their essential role in hyperscale data centers, colocations, and remote edge sites, PDU management often remains one of the least optimized and most overlooked areas in IT operations. As organizations grow and expand their infrastructure footprints, the challenges associated with PDU management multiply to create inefficiencies, drive up costs, and expose critical systems to unnecessary downtime.

    Why PDU Management is a Growing Concern

    For enterprises that have adopted traditional Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) platforms or out-of-band (OOB) solutions, it might seem like power infrastructure is already covered. However, these tools fall short when it comes to giving teams granular control of PDUs. Many only support SNMP-based monitoring, which means teams can see status data but can’t push configurations, perform power cycling, or recover unresponsive devices. OOB solutions also rely on a single WAN link, which can fail and cut off admin access.

    DCIM and OOB solutions lack PDU Management capabilities

    This lack of control results in IT teams still having to perform routine power management tasks on-site, even in supposedly modernized environments.

    The Three Major Challenges of PDU Management

    1. Operational Inefficiencies

    Most PDUs still require manual interaction for updates, configuration changes, or outlet-level power cycling. If a PDU becomes unresponsive, or if firmware updates fail mid-process, SNMP interfaces become useless and recovery options are limited. In these cases, IT personnel must physically travel to the site – sometimes covering long distances – just to perform a simple reboot or plug in a crash cart. This not only introduces unnecessary downtime but also drains IT resources and slows incident resolution.

    2. Slow Scaling

    As businesses grow, so does the number of PDUs deployed across their infrastructure. Yet when it comes to providing network capabilities, power systems are not designed with scalability in mind. Even network-connected PDUs lack support for modern automation frameworks like Ansible, Terraform, or Python. Without REST APIs, scripting interfaces, or integration with infrastructure-as-code platforms, IT teams are left managing each unit individually through outdated web GUIs or vendor-specific software. This manual approach doesn’t scale and leads to costly delays, especially during site rollouts or large-scale upgrades.

    3. High Administrative Overhead

    Enterprises managing hundreds or thousands of PDUs across distributed environments face overwhelming complexity. Without centralized visibility, tracking the health, configuration status, or firmware version of each device becomes impossible. When each PDU requires its own login, manual updates, and independent troubleshooting processes, power management becomes reactive, not strategic. This overhead not only wastes time but also increases the risk of misconfigurations, security gaps, and service disruptions.

    Best Practices for Modern PDU Management

    To move beyond these limitations, organizations must rethink their approach. The goal is to eliminate on-site dependencies, enable remote control, and consolidate management across all PDUs. This is where Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) comes into play.

    1. Enable Remote Power Management

    Connect PDUs to a dedicated management network, ideally through both Ethernet and serial interfaces. This allows for complete remote access, from initial provisioning to ongoing troubleshooting, even if the primary network link goes down.

    2. Automate Everything

    Adopt solutions that support infrastructure-as-code, automation scripts, and third-party integrations. By automating tasks like firmware updates, power cycling, and configuration pushes, organizations can drastically reduce manual workloads and improve accuracy.

    3. Centralize Administration

    Deploy a unified platform that can manage all PDUs, regardless of vendor or model, from a single interface. Centralization enables consistent policies, rapid issue resolution, and streamlined operations across all environments.

    Learn from the Experts: Download the Best Practices Guide

    ZPE Systems has worked with some of the world’s largest data center operators and remote IT teams to refine their power management strategies. IMI is their foundation for resilient, scalable, and efficient infrastructure operations. Our latest whitepaper, Best Practices for Managing Power Distribution Units in Data Centers & Remote Locations, dives deep into proven strategies for remote management, automation, and centralized control.

    What you’ll learn:

    • How to eliminate manual, on-site work with remote power management
    • How to scale PDU operations using automation and zero-touch provisioning
    • How to simplify administration across thousands of PDUs using an open-architecture platform

    Download the guide now to take the next step toward smarter, more sustainable IT operations.

    Get in Touch for a Demo of Remote PDU Management

    Our engineers are ready to show you how to manage your global PDU fleet and give you a demo of these best practices. Click below to set up a demo.

    The post Overcoming the Challenges of PDU Management in Modern IT Environments appeared first on ZPE Systems.

    ]]>