Having a resilient data center network is a top priority for the modern enterprise. Network failures can lead to costly downtime, security vulnerabilities, and operational disruptions. To mitigate these risks, companies invest in out-of-band management, cellular failover, next-generation firewalls (NGFWs), and automation. But, it can be hard to know what’s just a feature and what makes a truly resilient infrastructure solution. To help navigate this, we put together this out-of-band management vendor comparison that breaks down how Opengear, Perle, and Lantronix compare to ZPE Systems.

Out-of-Band Management

Out-of-band (OOB) management is critical for maintaining network access during outages or cyber incidents. OOB typically gives admins access via dedicated serial ports, and it’s mainly used during emergencies when devices or services fail and need to be restored. However, because of digital transformation initiatives like hybrid-cloud, Infrastructure-as-Code, and AI adoption, OOB’s requirements have evolved past simple remote troubleshooting. It must seamlessly integrate into diverse, multi-vendor environments, provide flexible automation, and be able to scale without adding management complexity.

Takeaway: ZPE Systems’ open architecture and ability to scale in diverse environments give it the edge, as it’s better suited to meet OOB’s modern requirements.

Isolated Management Infrastructure

Resilience requires a dedicated, autonomous layer for management. Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) is that layer. Unlike traditional OOB, IMI provides a physically and logically separated control plane that remains operational even when the production network is compromised. It’s essential for running services like monitoring, DNS, or firewalls independently from the primary network. Very few vendors offer true IMI support as part of their core platform.

Takeaway: Most vendors still treat management like traditional OOB, where it’s a tool for recovery and not proactive resilience. ZPE Systems is purpose-built for IMI, allowing businesses to maintain critical operations during outages or attacks.

Cellular Failover

Through outages, it’s no longer enough to just have a backup link. Cellular failover must ensure secure, intelligent, and seamless continuity. Many vendors provide cellular hardware, but few integrate the security, automation, and multi-carrier intelligence needed for real resilience.

Takeaway: While other vendors provide failover as a backup connection with limited intelligence, ZPE Systems stands out by combining carrier agility, security, and orchestration in one platform designed for business continuity.

Firewall Support

Organizations require more than just basic OOB access; they need platforms that can host advanced security services like Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs), DNS, and monitoring tools. Here’s how ZPE Systems compares to other OOB vendors in this regard:

Takeaway: While Opengear, Perle, and Lantronix provide OOB management solutions with some integrated firewall features, ZPE Systems stands out by offering a platform capable of hosting full-fledged NGFWs and other security services. This extensibility allows organizations to consolidate their infrastructure, reduce hardware sprawl, and enhance security within an isolated management environment.

Automation

Automation used to be a “nice to have” capability. Now, it’s critical for reducing human error, accelerating incident response, and enabling self-healing networks.

Takeaway: Most vendors focus on limited scripting or rules-based logic meant for small and simple deployments, not for scalable operations. ZPE Systems offers enterprise-wide automation that integrates with modern DevOps tools, enabling intelligent, self-healing infrastructure. For teams aiming to automate across distributed environments or achieve lights-out operations, ZPE Systems is the ideal solution.

Final Recommendation

OOB tools from Opengear, Perle, and Lantronix provide point solutions that help you react to network issues. On the other hand, ZPE Systems helps you achieve proactive resilience through isolation, service hosting, and automation. For organizations looking to stay one step ahead of outages, cyberattacks, and downtime, ZPE Systems offers a secure and scalable fabric.

Click the button to set up a demo and explore ZPE Systems’ single-box Nodegrid solution.

More Resources

• Opengear Lighthouse Appliances: Alternative Options
• Perle Console Server Replacement Options
• Video: ZPE Cloud Demo Presented by Marcel van Zwienen
• Comparing The Best Out-of-Band Management Devices
• Lantronix G520: Alternative Options
• Rollback Gone Wrong: How Out-of-Band Management Saved Our Engineering Backbone
• Why Gen 3 Out-of-Band is Your Strategic Weapon in 2025
• Out-of-Band Deployment Guide
• Best Network Automation Tools and What To Use Them For

I think it’s time to revisit the old school way of thinking about managing and securing IT infrastructure. The legacy use case for OOB is outdated. For the past decade, most IT teams have viewed out-of-band (OOB) as a last resort; an insurance policy for when something goes wrong. That mindset made sense when OOB technology was focused on connecting you to a switch or router.

Technology and the role of IT have changed so much in the last few years. There’s a lot more pressure on IT folks these days! But we get it, and that’s why ZPE’s OOB platform has changed to help you.

At a minimum, you have to ensure system endpoints are hardened against attacks, patch and update regularly, back up and restore critical systems, and be prepared to isolate compromised networks. In other words, you have to make sure those complicated hybrid environments don’t go off the rails and cost your company money. OOB for the “just-in-case” scenario doesn’t cut it anymore, and treating it that way is a huge missed opportunity.

Don’t Be Reactive. Be Resilient By Design.

Some OOB vendors claim they have the solution to get you through installation day, doomsday, and everyday ops. But if I’m candid, ZPE is the only vendor who can live up to this standard.   We do what no one else can do! Our work with the world’s largest, most well-known hyperscale and tech companies proves our architecture and design principles.

This Gen 3 out-of-band (aka Isolated Management Infrastructure) is about staying in control no matter what gets thrown at you.

OOB Has A New Job Description

Out-of-band is evolving because of today’s radically different network demands:

• Edge computing is pushing infrastructure into hard-to-reach (sometimes hostile) environments.
• Remote and hybrid ops teams need 24/7 secure access without relying on fragile VPNs.
• Ransomware and insider threats are rising, requiring an isolated recovery path that can’t be hijacked by attackers.
• Patching delays leave systems vulnerable for weeks or months, and faulty updates can cause crashes that are difficult to recover from.
• Automation and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) are no longer nice-to-haves – they’re essential for things like initial provisioning, config management, and everyday ops.

It’s a lot to add to the old “break/fix” job description. That’s why traditional OOB solutions fall short and we succeed. ZPE is designed to help teams enforce security policies, manage infrastructure proactively, drive automation, and do all the things that keep the bad stuff from happening in the first place. ZPE’s founders knew this evolution was coming, and that’s why they built Gen 3 out-of-band.

Gen 3 Out-of-Band Is Your Strategic Weapon

Unlike normal OOB setups that are bolted onto the production network, Gen 3 out-of-band is physically and logically separated via Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) approach. That separation is key – it gives teams persistent, secure access to infrastructure without touching the production network.

This means you stay in control no matter what.

Image: Gen 3 out-of-band management takes advantage of an approach called Isolated Management Infrastructure, a fully separate network that guarantees admin access when the main network is down.

Imagine your OOB system helping you:

• Push golden configurations across 100 remote sites without relying on a VPN.
• Automatically detect config drift and restore known-good states.
• Trigger remediation workflows when a security policy is violated.
• Run automation playbooks at remote locations using integrated tools like Ansible, Terraform, or GitOps pipelines.
• Maintain operations when production links are compromised or hijacked.
• Deploy the Gartner-recommended Secure Isolated Recovery Environment to stop an active cyberattack in hours (not weeks).

Gen 3 out-of-band is the dedicated management plane that enables all these things, which is a huge strategic advantage. Here are some real-world examples:

• Vapor IO shrunk edge data center deployment times to one hour and achieved full lights-out operations. No more late-night wakeup calls or expensive on-site visits.
• IAA refreshed their nationwide infrastructure while keeping 100% uptime and saving $17,500 per month in management costs.
• Living Spaces quadrupled business while saving $300,000 per year. They actually shrunk their workload and didn’t need to add any headcount.

OOB is no longer just for the worst day. Gen 3 out-of-band gives you the architecture and platform to build resilience into your business strategy and minimize what the worst day could be.

Check out these helpful resources

• Out-of-Band Deployment Guide
• Video: ZPE Cloud demo presented by Marcel van Zwienen
• How Oxidized Network Backups Improve Resilience
• Yes, You Can Have Out-of-Band Management in One Device
• How to Set Up An Out-of-Band Network Using Starlink

Connect With Me!

What is Out-of-Band Management?

Out-of-Band Management has been around for decades. It gives IT administrators remote access to network equipment through an independent channel, serving as a lifeline when the primary network is down.

Image: Traditional out-of-band solutions provide a secondary path to production infrastructure, but still rely in part on production equipment.

Most OOB solutions are like a backup entrance: if the main network is compromised, locked, or unavailable, OOB provides a way to “go around the front door” and fix the problem from the outside.

Key Characteristics:

• Separate Path: Usually uses dedicated serial ports, USB consoles, or cellular links.
• Primary Use Cases: Though OOB can be used for regular maintenance and updates, it’s typically used for emergency access, remote rebooting, BIOS/firmware-level diagnostics, and sometimes initial provisioning.
• Tools Involved: Console servers, terminal servers, or devices with embedded OOB ports (e.g., BMC/IPMI for servers).

Business Impact:

From a business standpoint, traditional OOB solutions offer reactive resilience that helps resolve outages faster and without costly site visits. It also reduces Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) and enhances the ability to manage remote or unmanned locations.

However, solutions like ZPE Systems’ Nodegrid provide robust capability that evolves out-of-band to a new level. This comprehensive, next-gen OOB is called Isolated Management Infrastructure.

What is Isolated Management Infrastructure?

Isolated Management Infrastructure furthers the concept of resilience and is a natural evolution of out-of-band. IMI does two things:

1. Rather than just providing a secondary path into production devices, IMI creates a completely separate management plane that does not rely on any production device.
2. IMI incorporates its own switches, routers, servers, and jumpboxes to support additional critical IT functions like networking, computing, security, and automation.

Image: Isolated Management Infrastructure creates a completely separate management plane and full-stack platform for maintaining critical services even during disruptions, and is strongly encouraged by CISA BOD 23-02.

IMI doesn’t just provide access during a crisis – it creates a separate layer of control and serves as a resilience system that keeps core services running no matter what. This gives organizations proactive resilience from simple upgrade errors and misconfigurations, to ransomware attacks and global disruptions like 2024’s CrowdStrike outage.

Key Characteristics:

• Fully Isolated Design: The management plane is physically and logically isolated from the production network, with console access to all production devices via a variety of interfaces including RS-232, Ethernet, USB, and IPMI.
• Backup Links: Uses two or more backup links for reliable access, such as 5G, Starlink, and others.
• Multi-Functionality: Hosts network monitoring, DNS, DHCP, automation engines, virtual firewalls, and all tools and functions to support critical services during disruptions.
• Automation: Provides a safe environment for teams to build, test, and integrate automation workflows, with the ability to automatically revert back to a golden image in case of errors.
• Ransomware Recovery: Hosts all tools, apps, and services to deploy the Gartner-recommended Secure Isolated Recovery Environments (SIRE).
• Zero Trust and Compliance Ready: Built to minimize blast radius and support regulated environments, with segmentation and zero trust security features such as MFA and Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC).

Business Impact:

IMI enables operational continuity in the face of cyberattacks, misconfigurations, or outages. It aligns with zero-trust principles and regulatory frameworks like NIST 800-207, making it ideal for government, finance, and healthcare. It also provides a foundation for modern DevSecOps and AI-driven automation strategies.

Comparing Reactive vs. Proactive Resilience

Why Businesses Should Care

For CIOs and CTOs

IMI is more than a management tool – it’s a strategic shift in infrastructure design. It minimizes dependency on the production network for critical IT functions and gives teams a layered defense. For organizations using AI, hybrid-cloud architectures, or edge computing, IMI is strongly encouraged and should be incorporated into the initial design.

For Network Architects and Engineers

IMI significantly reduces manual intervention during incidents. Instead of scrambling to access firewalls or core switches when something breaks, teams can rely on an isolated environment that remains fully operational. It also enables advanced automation workflows (e.g., self-healing, dynamic traffic rerouting) that just aren’t possible in traditional OOB environments.

Get a Demo of IMI

Set up a 15-minute demo to see IMI in action. Our experts will show you how to automatically provision devices, recover failed equipment, and combat ransomware. Use the button to set up your demo now.

Watch How IMI Improves Security

Rene Neumann (Director of Solution Engineering) gives a 10-minute presentation on IMI and how it enhances security.

AI is quickly becoming core to business-critical ops. It’s making manufacturing safer and more efficient, optimizing retail inventory management, and improving healthcare patient outcomes. But there’s a big question for those operating AI infrastructure: How can you make sure your systems stay online even when things go wrong?

AI system reliability is critical because it’s not just about building or using AI – it’s about making sure it’s available through outages, cyberattacks, and any other disruptions. To achieve this, organizations need to support their AI systems with a robust underlying infrastructure that enables secure remote network management.

The High Cost of Unreliable AI

When AI systems go down, customers and business users immediately feel the impact. Whether it’s a failed inference service, a frozen GPU node, or a misconfigured update that crashes an edge device, downtime results in:

• Missed business opportunities
• Poor customer experiences
• Safety and compliance risks
• Unrecoverable data losses

So why can’t admins just remote-in to fix the problem? Because traditional network infrastructure setups use a shared management plane. This means that management access depends on the same network as production AI workloads. When your management tools rely on the production network, you lose access exactly when you need it most – during outages, misconfigurations, or cyber incidents. It’s like if you were free-falling and your reserve parachute relied on your main parachute.

Image: Traditional network infrastructures are built so that remote admin access depends at least partially on the production network. If a production device fails, admin access is cut off.

This is why hyperscalers developed a specific best practice that is now catching on with large enterprises, Fortune companies, and even government agencies. This best practice is called Isolated Management Infrastructure, or IMI.

What is Isolated Management Infrastructure?

Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) separates management access from the production network. It’s a physically and logically distinct environment used exclusively for managing your infrastructure – servers, network switches, storage devices, and more. Remember the parachute analogy? It’s just like that: the reserve chute is a completely separate system designed to save you when the main system is compromised.

Image: Isolated Management Infrastructure fully separates management access from the production network, which gives admins a dependable path to ensure AI system reliability.

This isolation provides a reliable pathway to access and control AI infrastructure, regardless of what’s happening in the production environment.

How IMI Enhances AI System Reliability:

1. Always-On Access to Infrastructure
   Even if your production network is compromised or offline, IMI remains reachable for diagnostics, patching, or reboots.
2. Separation of Duties
   Keeping management traffic separate limits the blast radius of failures or breaches, and helps you confidently apply or roll back config changes through a chain of command.
3. Rapid Problem Resolution
   Admins can immediately act on alerts or failures without waiting for primary systems to recover, and instantly launch a Secure Isolated Recovery Environment (SIRE) to combat active cyberattacks.
4. Secure Automation
   Admins are often reluctant to apply firmware/software updates or automation workflows out of fear that they’ll cause an outage. IMI gives them a safe environment to test these changes before rolling out to production, and also allows them to safely roll back using a golden image.

IMI vs. Out-of-Band: What’s the Difference?

While out-of-band (OOB) management is a component of many reliable infrastructures, it’s not sufficient on its own. OOB typically refers to a single device’s backup access path, like a serial console or IPMI port.

IMI is broader and architectural: it builds an entire parallel management ecosystem that’s secure, scalable, and independent from your AI workloads. Think of IMI as the full management backbone, not just a side street or second entrance, but a dedicated freeway. Check out this full breakdown comparing OOB vs IMI.

Use Case: Finance

Consider a financial services firm using AI for fraud detection. During a network misconfiguration incident, their LLMs stop receiving real-time data. Without IMI, engineers would be locked out of the systems they need to fix, similar to the CrowdStrike outage of 2024. But with IMI in place, they can restore routing in minutes, which helps them keep compliance systems online while avoiding regulatory fines, reputation damage, and other potential fallout.

Use Case: Manufacturing

Consider a manufacturing company using AI-driven computer vision on the factory floor to spot defects in real time. When a firmware update triggers a failure across several edge inference nodes, the primary network goes dark. Production stops, and on-site technicians no longer have access to the affected devices. With IMI, the IT team can remote-into the management plane, roll back the update, and bring the system back online within minutes, keeping downtime to a minimum while avoiding expensive delays in order fulfillment.

How To Architect for AI System Reliability

Achieving AI system reliability starts well before the first model is trained and even before GPU racks come online. It begins at the infrastructure layer. Here are important things to consider when architecting your IMI:

• Build a dedicated management network that’s isolated from production.
• Make sure to support functions such as Ethernet switching, serial switching, jumpbox/crash-cart, 5G, and automation.
• Use zero-trust access controls and role-based permissions for administrative actions.
• Design your IMI to scale across data centers, colocation sites, and edge locations.

Image: Architecting AI system reliability using IMI means deploying Ethernet switches, serial switches, WAN routers, 5G, and up to nine total functions. ZPE Systems’ Nodegrid eliminates the need for separate devices, as these edge routers can host all the functions necessary to deploy a complete IMI.

By treating management access as mission-critical, you ensure that AI system reliability is built-in rather than reactive.

Get in Touch for a Demo of AI Infrastructure Best Practices

Our engineers are ready to walk you through the basics and give you a demo of these best practices. Click below to set up a demo.

More AI Infrastructure Resources:

• The Elephant in the Data Center: How To Make AI Infrastructure Resilient
• Why Out-of-Band Management is Critical to AI Infrastructure
• Video: Optimizing Remote Management and AI Infrastructure Automation
• The Future of Data Centers: Overcoming the Challenges of Lights-Out Operations
• Out-of-Band Deployment Guide
• AI Orchestration: Solving Challenges to Improve AI Value

Power Distribution Units (PDUs) are the unsung heroes of reliable IT operations. They provide the one thing that nobody pays attention to unless it’s gone: stable, uninterrupted power. Despite their essential role in hyperscale data centers, colocations, and remote edge sites, PDU management often remains one of the least optimized and most overlooked areas in IT operations. As organizations grow and expand their infrastructure footprints, the challenges associated with PDU management multiply to create inefficiencies, drive up costs, and expose critical systems to unnecessary downtime.

Why PDU Management is a Growing Concern

For enterprises that have adopted traditional Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) platforms or out-of-band (OOB) solutions, it might seem like power infrastructure is already covered. However, these tools fall short when it comes to giving teams granular control of PDUs. Many only support SNMP-based monitoring, which means teams can see status data but can’t push configurations, perform power cycling, or recover unresponsive devices. OOB solutions also rely on a single WAN link, which can fail and cut off admin access.

This lack of control results in IT teams still having to perform routine power management tasks on-site, even in supposedly modernized environments.

The Three Major Challenges of PDU Management

1. Operational Inefficiencies

Most PDUs still require manual interaction for updates, configuration changes, or outlet-level power cycling. If a PDU becomes unresponsive, or if firmware updates fail mid-process, SNMP interfaces become useless and recovery options are limited. In these cases, IT personnel must physically travel to the site – sometimes covering long distances – just to perform a simple reboot or plug in a crash cart. This not only introduces unnecessary downtime but also drains IT resources and slows incident resolution.

2. Slow Scaling

As businesses grow, so does the number of PDUs deployed across their infrastructure. Yet when it comes to providing network capabilities, power systems are not designed with scalability in mind. Even network-connected PDUs lack support for modern automation frameworks like Ansible, Terraform, or Python. Without REST APIs, scripting interfaces, or integration with infrastructure-as-code platforms, IT teams are left managing each unit individually through outdated web GUIs or vendor-specific software. This manual approach doesn’t scale and leads to costly delays, especially during site rollouts or large-scale upgrades.

3. High Administrative Overhead

Enterprises managing hundreds or thousands of PDUs across distributed environments face overwhelming complexity. Without centralized visibility, tracking the health, configuration status, or firmware version of each device becomes impossible. When each PDU requires its own login, manual updates, and independent troubleshooting processes, power management becomes reactive, not strategic. This overhead not only wastes time but also increases the risk of misconfigurations, security gaps, and service disruptions.

Best Practices for Modern PDU Management

To move beyond these limitations, organizations must rethink their approach. The goal is to eliminate on-site dependencies, enable remote control, and consolidate management across all PDUs. This is where Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) comes into play.

1. Enable Remote Power Management

Connect PDUs to a dedicated management network, ideally through both Ethernet and serial interfaces. This allows for complete remote access, from initial provisioning to ongoing troubleshooting, even if the primary network link goes down.

2. Automate Everything

Adopt solutions that support infrastructure-as-code, automation scripts, and third-party integrations. By automating tasks like firmware updates, power cycling, and configuration pushes, organizations can drastically reduce manual workloads and improve accuracy.

3. Centralize Administration

Deploy a unified platform that can manage all PDUs, regardless of vendor or model, from a single interface. Centralization enables consistent policies, rapid issue resolution, and streamlined operations across all environments.

Get in Touch for a Demo of Remote PDU Management

Our engineers are ready to show you how to manage your global PDU fleet and give you a demo of these best practices. Click below to set up a demo.

More PDU Management Resources:

• • Serial Console PDU Management Guide
  • PDU Remote Management
  • Solutions Guide: Automated PDU Provisioning and Configuration
  • Video: Optimizing Remote Management and AI Infrastructure Automation
  • The Future of Data Centers: Overcoming the Challenges of Lights-Out Operations
  • Out-of-Band Deployment Guide

The Shift from Cloud to On-Premises

Cloud computing has been the go-to solution for businesses seeking scalability, flexibility, and cost savings. But according to a 2024 IDC survey, 80% of IT decision-makers expect to repatriate some workloads from the cloud within the next 12 months. As businesses mature in their digital journeys, they’re realizing that the cloud isn’t always the most effective – or economical – solution for every application.

This trend, known as cloud repatriation, is gaining momentum.

Key Takeaways From This Article:

• Cloud repatriation is a strategic move toward cost control, improved performance, and enhanced compliance.
• Performance-sensitive and highly regulated workloads benefit most from on-prem or edge deployments.
• Hybrid and multi-cloud strategies offer flexibility without sacrificing control.
• ZPE Systems enables enterprises to build and manage cloud-like infrastructure outside the public cloud.

What is Cloud Repatriation?

Cloud repatriation refers to the process of moving data, applications, or workloads from public cloud services back to on-premises infrastructure or private data centers. Whether driven by cost, performance, or compliance concerns, cloud repatriation helps organizations regain control over their IT environments.

Why Are Companies Moving Back to On-Prem?

Here are the top six reasons why companies are moving away from the cloud and toward a strategy more suited for optimizing business operations.

1. Managing Unpredictable Cloud Costs

While cloud computing offers pay-as-you-go pricing, many businesses find that costs can spiral out of control. Factors such as unpredictable data transfer fees, underutilized resources, and long-term storage expenses contribute to higher-than-expected bills.

Key Cost Factors Leading to Cloud Repatriation:

• High data egress and transfer fees
• Underutilized cloud resources
• Long-term costs that outweigh on-prem investments

By bringing workloads back in-house or pushed out to the edge, organizations can better control IT spending and optimize resource allocation.

2. Enhancing Security and Compliance

Security and compliance remain critical concerns for businesses, particularly in highly regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and government.

Why cloud repatriation boosts security:

• Data sovereignty and jurisdictional control
• Minimized risk of third-party breaches
• Greater control over configurations and policy enforcement

Repatriating sensitive workloads enables better compliance with laws like GDPR, CCPA, and other industry-specific regulations.

3. Boosting Performance and Reducing Latency

Some workloads – especially AI, real-time analytics, and IoT – require ultra-low latency and consistent performance that cloud environments can’t always deliver.

Performance benefits of repatriation:

• Reduced latency for edge computing
• Greater control over bandwidth and hardware
• Predictable and optimized infrastructure performance

Moving compute closer to where data is created ensures faster decision-making and better user experiences.

4. Avoiding Vendor Lock-In

Public cloud platforms often use proprietary tools and APIs that make it difficult (and expensive) to migrate.

Repatriation helps businesses:

• Escape restrictive vendor ecosystems
• Avoid escalating costs due to over-dependence
• Embrace open standards and multi-vendor flexibility

Bringing workloads back on-premises or adopting a multi-cloud or hybrid strategy allows businesses to diversify their IT infrastructure, reducing dependency on any one provider.

5. Meeting Data Sovereignty Requirements

Many organizations operate across multiple geographies, making data sovereignty a major consideration. Laws governing data storage and privacy can vary by region, leading to compliance risks for companies storing data in public cloud environments.

Cloud repatriation addresses this by:

• Storing data in-region for legal compliance
• Reducing exposure to cross-border data risks
• Strengthening data governance practices

Repatriating workloads enables businesses to align with local regulations and maintain compliance more effectively.

6. Embracing a Hybrid or Multi-Cloud Strategy

Rather than choosing between cloud or on-prem, forward-thinking companies are designing hybrid and multi-cloud architectures that combine the best of both worlds.

Benefits of a Hybrid or Multi-Cloud Strategy:

• Leverages the best of both public and private cloud environments
• Optimizes workload placement based on cost, performance, and compliance
• Enhances disaster recovery and business continuity

By strategically repatriating specific workloads while maintaining cloud-based services where they make sense, businesses achieve greater resilience and efficiency.

The Challenge: Retaining Cloud-Like Flexibility On-Prem

Many IT teams hesitate to repatriate due to fears of losing cloud-like convenience. Cloud platforms offer centralized management, on-demand scaling, and rapid provisioning that traditional infrastructure lacks – until now.

That’s where ZPE Systems comes in.

ZPE Systems Accelerates Cloud Repatriation

For over a decade, ZPE Systems has been behind the scenes, helping build the very cloud infrastructures enterprises rely on. Now, ZPE empowers businesses to reclaim that control with:

• The Nodegrid Services Router platform: Bringing cloud-like orchestration and automation to on-prem and edge environments
• ZPE Cloud: A unified management layer that simplifies remote operations, provisioning, and scaling

With ZPE, enterprises can repatriate cloud workloads while maintaining the agility and visibility they’ve come to expect from public cloud environments.

The Nodegrid platform combines powerful hardware with intelligent, centralized orchestration, serving as the backbone of hybrid infrastructures. Nodegrid devices are designed to handle a wide variety of functions, from secure out-of-band management and automation to networking, workload hosting, and even AI computer vision. ZPE Cloud serves as the cloud-based management and orchestration platform, which gives organizations full visibility and control over their repatriated environments..

• Multi-functional infrastructure: Nodegrid devices consolidate networking, security, and workload hosting into a single, powerful platform capable of adapting to diverse enterprise needs.
• Automation-ready: Supports custom scripts, APIs, and orchestration tools to automate provisioning, failover, and maintenance across remote sites.
• Cloud-based management: ZPE Cloud provides centralized visibility and control, allowing teams to manage and orchestrate edge and on-prem systems with the ease of a public cloud.

Ready to Explore Cloud Repatriation?

Discover how your organization can take back control of its IT environment without sacrificing agility. Schedule a demo with ZPE Systems today and see how easy it is to build a modern, flexible, and secure on-prem or edge infrastructure.

Additional Resources

• Watch: ZPE Cloud Demonstration Presented by Marcel Van Zwienen
• Watch: Making Networks Hard to Fail and Easy to Recover – ZPE Systems at Cisco Live 2024
• Watch: Run your own cloud instance in a box with Nodegrid
• Out-of-Band Deployment Guide
• Why Out-of-Band Management is Critical to AI Infrastructure
• Edge Computing Use Cases By Industry

The Growing Role of AI in Networking and Security

AI is transforming industries, and networking and security are no exceptions. Whether businesses consume AI tools as a service or integrate them directly into their infrastructure for cost savings and control, the impact of AI is undeniable. Organizations worldwide are rapidly adopting AI-powered solutions to optimize network operations, automate security responses, and improve overall efficiency.

But one glaring issue remains: After acquiring AI infrastructure, many organizations find themselves asking, “Now what?”

Despite the excitement around AI’s potential, there is a significant lack of clear, actionable guidance on how to deploy, recover, and secure AI-powered networks. This gap in best practices and implementation strategies leaves businesses vulnerable to operational inefficiencies, unforeseen challenges, and security risks.

So, how can organizations harness AI’s potential and ensure the resilience of their multi-million-dollar investment? Here are lessons learned from enterprises that have successfully implemented AI in their IT environments, along with a downloadable best practices guide for deploying, recovering, and securing AI data centers.

Understanding AI’s Role in Network Management

Like autonomous driving, AI adoption in network management operates at different levels:

1. No AI: Traditional, manual network operations.
2. AI consuming logs for alerts: Basic monitoring and reporting.
3. AI consuming logs with broader data access: Enhanced insights for more informed decision-making.
4. AI-driven network decision-making in specific areas: AI autonomously manages certain aspects of the network.
5. AI managing all IT infrastructure: A fully autonomous, AI-powered network.

As with autonomous vehicles, human oversight remains crucial. There must always be a way for administrators to take control in case AI makes an error. The key to ensuring uninterrupted access and oversight is by using an Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) — a separate, dedicated management layer designed for resilience and security.

Why an Isolated Management Infrastructure (IMI) is Essential to AI Resilience

AI-driven networks need a dedicated infrastructure that enables human operators to intervene when necessary. Here are a few reasons why:

• Security and Isolation: What if AI induces a vulnerability or disruption? IMI is separate from production, giving teams a lifeline to gain management access and fix the problem.
• Network Recovery & Control: What if AI misconfigures the network? IMI allows human administrators to override AI decisions and roll back to the last good configuration.
• Resilience Against Threats: What if ransomware strikes? IMI’s isolation keeps admin access safe from attack and allows teams to fight back using an Isolated Recovery Environment.

Diagram: Isolated Management Infrastructure provides a separate, secure environment for admins to manage and automate AI infrastructure.

IMI is also becoming the standard called for by regulatory bodies. CISA and DORA mandate separate, air-gapped network infrastructures to support zero-trust security frameworks and strengthen resilience. The major roadblock that most organizations face, however, is that successfully implementing an IMI requires technical expertise and a strategic approach.

Challenges in Deploying an IMI

Organizations looking to build a robust, isolated management network must navigate several challenges:

• High Complexity & Cost: Traditional approaches require multiple devices (routers, VPNs, serial consoles, 5G WAN, etc.), leading to higher costs and integration challenges.
• Manual Network Management: Some organizations still rely on IT personnel or truck rolls to resolve issues, which increases costs and forces teams to focus on operations rather than improving business value.
• Machine-Speed Operations vs. Human Response Times: AI operates at unprecedented speeds, making manual intervention impractical without an automated and isolated management solution.
• Extremely Limited Space: AI deployments are “packed to the gills” with compute nodes, storage, networking, power/cooling, and management gear, and there is often no room to deploy the 6+ devices needed for a proper IMI.

The Blueprint for AI-Operated Networks

ZPE Systems has collaborated with leading enterprises to define best practices for implementing an IMI. These best practices are described in the downloadable guide below. Here’s a snapshot of some key components:

1. A Unified Hardware or Virtual Device

• A central out-of-band management platform for both physical and cloud infrastructure.
• Open, extensible architecture to run critical applications securely.

2. Comprehensive Interface Support

• Traditional RS-232 serial console, USB, and OCP interfaces for network recovery.
• Serial console access ensures recovery even if AI misconfigures IP routing or network addresses.

3. Switchable Power Distribution Units (PDUs)

• Enables remote power cycling to recover hardware that becomes unresponsive during software updates.

4. An Integrated Software Stack

• Historically, enterprises combined Juniper routers, Dell switches, Cradlepoint 4G modems, serial consoles, HP jump servers, Palo Alto Firewalls, and SD-WAN for remote access.
• ZPE Systems consolidates these functions into a single, cohesive solution with Nodegrid out-of-band management.

5. Flexible Management Options

• Supports both on-premises and cloud-based management solutions for varying operational needs.

6. Security at all Layers

• Built-in security features ensure third-party validation and compliance with regulatory standards.

Get in Touch for a Demo of AI Infrastructure Best Practices

Our engineers are ready to walk you through the basics and give you a demo of these best practices. Click below to set up a demo.

More AI Infrastructure Resources:

• Why Out-of-Band Management is Critical to AI Infrastructure
• Video: Optimizing Remote Management and AI Infrastructure Automation
• The Future of Data Centers: Overcoming the Challenges of Lights-Out Operations
• Out-of-Band Deployment Guide
• AI Orchestration: Solving Challenges to Improve AI Value

In IT infrastructure management, two essential tools often come into play: KVM switches and serial consoles. While they may seem similar at first glance, understanding their distinct functionalities is crucial for system administrators. In this guide, we’ll break down their differences, use cases, and how they can work together for optimal infrastructure management.

What is a KVM Switch?

A KVM (Keyboard, Video, Mouse) switch is a hardware device that allows users to control multiple computers from a single keyboard, monitor, and mouse. This setup eliminates the need for multiple peripherals, streamlining IT operations.

Benefits of using a KVM switch:

• Centralized Management: Control multiple servers from one console.
• Space & Cost Efficiency: Reduces clutter and hardware costs in server rooms.
• Graphical Interface Access: Enables GUI-based management for various operating systems.
• Remote Management: Some KVM switches offer IP-based remote access for IT teams.

KVM switches are ideal for data centers, server management, and IT environments where GUI access is necessary.

What is a Serial Console?

A serial console, also called a console server, provides remote access to devices via serial ports. It is primarily used to manage network equipment such as routers, switches, and firewalls — especially when network access is unavailable.

Key advantages of serial consoles:

• Out-of-Band Management: Provides access even when the primary network is down.
• Command-Line Interface (CLI) Support: Essential for configuring network devices.
• Improved Security: Enables remote troubleshooting without exposing devices to the main network.
• Multi-Vendor Support: Works with various networking and industrial hardware.

Serial consoles are indispensable for network management, disaster recovery, and remote troubleshooting of mission-critical systems. They provide low-level access to equipment and serve as an administrative lifeline when the primary network is not working properly.

KVM Switch vs. Serial Console: A Side-By-Side Comparison

When to Use a KVM Switch vs. Serial Console

Choose a KVM switch if:

• You need to manage multiple servers with a graphical interface.
• Your IT infrastructure includes Windows, Linux, or other GUI-based systems.
• Remote desktop-style management is required.

Choose a serial console if:

• You need to configure network hardware like routers and firewalls.
• Out-of-band management is crucial for your IT setup.
• You need access when the primary network fails.

Combining KVM Switches and Serial Consoles for More Capability

Many IT environments benefit from using both KVM switches and serial consoles in tandem. This setup allows IT teams to efficiently manage both graphical and command-line-based systems, ensuring comprehensive remote access and troubleshooting capabilities. The drawback to this is that it requires deploying more devices, which not only increases costs, but also increases complexity and workloads for IT teams.

Simplify IT Management with ZPE Systems’ Nodegrid Devices

Why choose between a KVM switch and a serial console when you can have both in a single device? ZPE Systems’ Nodegrid solutions combine KVM and serial console functionality into an all-in-one platform, simplifying IT infrastructure management.

Why choose Nodegrid?

• Unified Management: Access servers, routers, switches, and more from one interface.
• Enhanced Security: Secure out-of-band management with built-in Zero Trust architecture.
• Remote Access: Control your entire infrastructure from anywhere, even during network failures.
• Scalability: Streamline operations for edge, branch, and data center environments.

Upgrade your IT management with the versatile, secure, and efficient out-of-band solution. Browse our collection of products that combine KVM and serial console functionalities, and get in touch for a free demo.

See KVM & Serial Console Functionality in This Tech Demo

Jordan Baker (Tech Writer) shows how to migrate your existing solution to Nodegrid, and gives a 5-minute tech demo of what it’s like to manage serial connections, PDUs, and KVM switches, all from one interface. Watch now and visit our serial console migration page for special offers.

Discover More Resources

• • What is Network Management?
  • Comparing The Best Out-of-Band Management Devices
  • Video: ZPE Cloud demo presented by Marcel van Zwienen
  • Case study: Re-architecting the internet with Vapor IO
  • Out-of-Band Deployment Guide